Saturday, 30 June 2012

STEVE JOBS WINS

Adobe is Ditching Flash
Steve Jobs

It has been just over two years since Steve Jobs wrote his "Thoughts on Flash" essay.
Jobs criticized Adobe because, "flash was created during the PC era – for PCs and mice...But the mobile era is about low power devices, touch interfaces and open web standards – all areas where Flash falls short."
Apparently Jobs was right.
In a blog post yesterday, Adobe addressed concerns that it would no longer support mobile flash on Android's latest operating system, Jelly Bean. The flash-maker confirmed previous news that they in fact will not support mobile flash but instead the company will focus on flash for PC.
Back in 2010 Jobs said, "flash has not performed well on mobile devices. We have routinely asked Adobe to show us Flash performing well on a mobile device, any mobile device, for a few years now. We have never seen it."
We never will see it. After August 15 of this year mobile flash will begin to fade out of the picture. Don't worry, if you already have flash installed on your device. Adobe will still continue to issue security updates and other vital patches for existing users.
Being able to access flash-based web content from Android devices was once a huge selling point for Google based tablets and phones.
Going forward Adobe says, "the easiest way to ensure ongoing access to Flash Player on Android 4.0 or earlier devices is to use certified devices and ensure that the Flash Player is either pre-installed by the manufacturer or installed from Google Play Store before August 15th."


Thanks: Business Insider

Saturday, 23 June 2012

The Microsoft Surface Tablet Is Going To Be A Total Flop


Steve Ballmer

The Microsoft tablet, the Surface, is going to be a total flop.

The more information that leaks out about it, the more it seems clear that Microsoft is not going to kill the iPad with the Surface, at least not on this first try. And, more likely, never.
There are a couple of reasons the Surface won't be a success, but the two main points are:
  • The premise is flawed. Microsoft's appeal to consumers is that the iPad can't do enough. The Surface is supposed to replace the tablet and the laptop. Consumers are happy with the iPad as an additive product — it's not meant to replace a laptop right now. Trying to be two things at once will lead to the Surface being neither.
  • It will start at $600. Why pay a premium for an inferior product? The iPad 2 costs $400, and it's great. The new iPad is $500 at entry level and it's really great. The Kindle Fire costs $200, and it's adequate. Microsoft isn't going to win the high-end battle, and it's not fighting the low end.
Lesser reasons: Microsoft is only selling the Surface at its stores, the battery life might be worse, it has a kickstand, consumers don't think of Microsoft as a great, hip, cool brand, the Zune, its biggest selling point is a keyboard almost no one has used, etc.
If Microsoft can't sell tablets, it's not going to inspire its already hesitant partners to build their own versions of Windows tablets. If they don't build tablets to challenge Apple, then Apple could run away with the market.
If Apple runs away with the market, Windows is in real trouble. Steve Ballmer said at the Surface presentation that Windows is at the core of everything Microsoft does. If Windows is at risk, Microsoft is at risk.
That's a lot of ifs. But we're not the only ones who think the iPad is a big threat to Windows. Microsoft wouldn't have taken the drastic step of releasing its own hardware if it wasn't scared to death of Apple.


Source: Business Insider